|
PRESENTS Making sense of Black Economic Empowerment
COURTESY
In 1948, the Afrikaner nation was politically liberated from English rule. This political liberation was both preceded and followed by National Party programmes to economically empower the Afrikaner people who were marginalized by English domination of the economy. Thus, policies were fast tracked and legislation, such as the Marketing Act, was enacted to favour white Afrikaans-speakers and build Afrikaner participation in the economy, through companies such as Sanlam and Gencor.
A strategy that worked well
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act
In terms of the Empowerment Act, two concepts must be highlighted:
Secondly the term to be highlighted is “black”, according to the Empowerment Act “a generic term which means Africans, Coloureds and Indians.” The term “Previously Disadvantaged Individuals”, as broadly used by government, also includes women and the physically challenged of all races.
The issue at stake is the long-term sustainability and economic growth of South Africa.
As South Africa celebrate 10 years of democracy, all South Africans can be proud of what the country has achieved in terms of the better-than-ever economy, the World Cup 2010 vote of confidence from the international community and the peaceful integration of the myriad of cultures in the country.
Huge problems to be addressed
Changing profile
It is also clear that 15 million economically active people in a total population of 45 million is problematic. There is an urgent need to bring the majority of South Africans into the mainstream of the economy, where they can meaningfully participate. A broader base of economically active people can only benefit everyone in the country.
South Africans are known for their ingenuity and entrepreneurship. The innovative ideas and new inventions that remain dormant and will be unleashed when all South Africans participate in the economy is an exciting possibility and could rapidly see South Africa becoming more competitive internationally.
There are further huge implications for employers in this country – the need for skills development and training has become critical to ensure a sustainable and educated labour force, which can help drive the economy to be globally competitive. To address this issue, the Skills Development Act and Skills Development Levy Act were promulgated, to encourage employers to train unemployed workers and claim the expenses back from the Department of Labour, via SETAs. The process is funded by a 1% of payroll levy companies must pay to the South African Department of Labour.
Major concern
In the same way the government is compelled to address the land issue in South Africa in a fair and structured way, poverty and the distribution of wealth must be addressed to avoid the issues being turned into a political platform for revolution.
No exclusion on race
The South African Department of Trade and Industry’s (the dti) BEE Strategy document (download a copy from http://www.thedti.gov.za) states that the way to grow the economy is through more enterprises producing more value-added goods and services, attracting investment and creating employment. “Thus, a core component of the BEE strategy is the creation and nurturing of new enterprises undertaking new forms of economic and value-adding activities. We seek in BEE a new vitality in our economy by facilitating new entrants to all aspects of the economy.”
Scorecard
Thus, BEE is not an ownership only issue, but is a broad approach. The government demonstrates its understanding that BEE ownership is not a quick fix and that different sectors and different companies will not be able to contribute in the same way.
The scorecard will be issued as a Code of Good Conduct, as a flexible framework for the various industry sectors, as they draw up their BEE Charters.
Explaining the scorecard system
The Department of Trade an Industry’s (the dti) proposed BEE Scorecard focuses equally (30% of the total score each) on direct empowerment, through ownership (20%) and management (10%) of enterprises and assets; human resource development through skills development (20%) and employment equity (10%); and indirect empowerment in the form of preferential procurement (20%) and enterprise development (10%). The remaining (10%) is to be determined by the sector or enterprise and allows for flexibility according to the unique circumstances. This could include corporate social investment, beneficiation of raw materials or the support of rural enterprises.
This flexibility will allow for a company with no black ownership to still score well on the scorecard, by emphasising the other areas, such as skills development and procurement. It may even be possible for such a company to score better than a black-owned company, who does not score in any other area. Thus, the scorecard approach, to some extent, does address the problem of “fronting” and creates a more level playing field. (See: What is "Fronting") FRONTING
It is expected that the dti’s proposed scorecard will be amended and published as a Code of Practice by the end of the year.
Conclusion
By Monique METCALFE
COMMENTS RECEIVED
Hi Monique,
Hello Peter
Hi Monique,
Thanks Peter for sending me this link, I learnt alot from the article and forwarded to a few contacts of mine who would find it quite intresting.
WHERE TO FROM HERE? BEE BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT
***********************************
BACK TO BLACK BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT FRONT PAGE
***********************************
DISCLAIMER
The Foundation for the Development of Africa
***********************************
"Sustainable Development is the action and/or act of bringing people
***********************************
***********************************
THE FDA SUPPORTS AND ENDORSES:
***********************************
© Copyright 1999
Website search technology courtesy:
|